Resumo Há uma enorme disparidade entre os países de alta renda e outros em termos de acesso a dispositivos médicos cardíacos, como marca-passos e desfibriladores implantáveis. Os custos são uma das principais barreiras ao uso de dispositivos cardíacos nesses países. Existem iniciativas internacionais que visam reduzir essa disparidade, e o reuso de marca-passos tem sido discutido como uma possível alternativa. O conceito de reutilização de marca-passos não é novo; entretanto, estudos recentes têm se mostrado seguros, éticos e eficazes para aqueles que precisam de dispositivos eletrônicos cardíacos implantáveis e não tem como adquiri-los. Parte dos países de língua portuguesa, especialmente na África, precisam de uma resposta imediata que beneficie seus inúmeros pacientes que sofrem de arritmias tratáveis. marcapassos marca passos alternativa novo entretanto seguros adquirilos. adquirilos adquiri los. los adquiri-los portuguesa África tratáveis

Abstract There is a gap between high-income countries and others in terms of access to medical cardiac devices, such as pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators. Costs are one of the main barriers to the use of cardiac devices in these countries. There are international initiatives that aim to reduce the gap. The reuse of pacemakers has been discussed as a possible alternative to this problem. The concept of reusing pacemakers is not new; however, recent studies have proven to be safe, ethical, and effective for those who need cardiac implantable electronic devices and cannot afford them. Part of the Portuguese-speaking countries, especially in Africa, need an immediate response that benefits their countless patients who suffer from treatable arrhythmias. highincome high income defibrillators problem new however safe ethical them Portuguesespeaking Portuguese speaking Africa arrhythmias

Abstract Introduction: Indications for cardiac devices have been increasing as well as the need for lead extractions as a result of infections, failed leads and device recalls. Powered laser sheaths, with a global trend towards the in-creasingly technological tools, meant to improve the procedure’s outcome but have economic implications. Objective: The aim of this study is to demonstrate the experience of a Bra-zilian center that uses simple manual traction in most lead removals per-formed annually, questioning the real need for expensive and technically challenging new devices. Methods: This retrospective observational study included 35 patients who had a transvenous lead extraction in the period of a year between January 1998 and October 2014 at Hospital de Messejana Dr. Carlos Alberto Studart Gomes, in Fortaleza, CE, Brazil. Data were collected through a records review. They were evaluated based on age, type of device, dwelling time, indication for removal, technique used and immediate outcomes. Results: The median dwelling time of the devices was 46.22 months. Infec-tion, lead fracture and device malfunction were the most common indica-tions. Simple traction was the method of choice, used in 88.9% of the pro-cedures. Manual traction presented high success rates, resulting in com-plete removal without complications in 90% of the cases. Conclusion: This article suggests that lead extraction by simple manual traction can still be performed effectively in countries with economic diffi-culties as a first attempt, leaving auxiliary tools for a second attempt in case of failure or contraindications to the simple manual traction technique.

Resumo Fundamento: A evolução do paciente chagásico após implante de cardiodesfibrilador implantável (CDI) é tema ainda controverso. Objetivo: Comparar a evolução clínica pós-implante do CDI em pacientes com cardiopatia chagásica crônica (CCC) e cardiopatia isquêmica (CI). Métodos: Trata-se de um estudo prospectivo histórico de uma população de 153 pacientes portadores de CDI, sendo 65 com CCC e 88 com CI. Os dispositivos foram implantados entre janeiro de 2003 e novembro de 2011, tendo-se comparado a taxa de sobrevida e a sobrevida livre de eventos entre essas populações. Resultados: Os grupos foram similares na predominância do sexo masculino, classe funcional e fração de ejeção. Os pacientes isquêmicos são em média 10 anos mais velhos que os chagásicos (p < 0,05). Os pacientes chagásicos apresentavam escolaridade e renda mensal mais baixa do que os isquêmicos (p < 0,05). Foi demonstrado que o número de terapias apropriadas nos pacientes com CCC é 2,07 vezes maior do que naqueles com CI. A incidência de choque apropriado é maior na CCC (p < 0,05). As taxas de mortalidade anual nos dois grupos foram similares, assim como a incidência de tempestade elétrica. Não houve nenhuma morte súbita nos pacientes com CCC e apenas uma nos pacientes com CI. Não houve diferença estatisticamente significativa no tempo de sobrevida entre os dois grupos (p = 0,720) nem na sobrevida livre de eventos (p = 0,143). Conclusão: A CCC duplica o risco de receber terapias apropriadas em relação à CI, mostrando assim maior complexidade das arritmias nos pacientes chagásicos.

Abstract Background: The outcome of Chagas disease patients after receiving implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) is still controversial. Objective: To compare clinical outcomes after ICD implantation in patients with chronic Chagas cardiomyopathy (CCC) and ischemic heart disease (IHD). Methods: Prospective study of a population of 153 patients receiving ICD (65 with CCC and 88 with IHD). The devices were implanted between 2003 and 2011. Survival rates and event-free survival were compared. Results: The groups were similar regarding sex, functional class and ejection fraction. Ischemic patients were, on average, 10 years older than CCC patients (p < 0.05). Patients with CCC had lower schooling and monthly income than IHD patients (p < 0.05). The number of appropriate therapies was 2.07 higher in CCC patients, who had a greater incidence of appropriate shock (p < 0.05). Annual mortality rate and electrical storm incidence were similar in both groups. There was no sudden death in CCC patients, and only one in IHD patients. Neither survival time (p = 0.720) nor event-free survival (p = 0.143) significantly differed between the groups. Conclusion: CCC doubles the risk of receiving appropriate therapies as compared to IHD, showing the greater complexity of arrhythmias in Chagas patients.